Disney / Marvel and the American Political Zeitgeist
In examining Disney / Marvel’s influence on the American political zeitgeist, it becomes apparent that the hands controlling the tools of production and creation are the enablers of former villains, replicating the same fraudulent smoke screens with less facility. The trajectory of cinema, music, art, and entertainment has been in a downward spiral since the advent of the digital age. This decline is an inevitable byproduct of one singular concept: intellectual property intersecting with the digital age.
Intellectual Property: An Analysis
Intellectual in·tel·lect /ˈɪntəlˌɛkt/
noun
1. The ability to learn and reason; the capacity for knowledge and understanding.
2. THOUGHT: PROPERTY OF THE MIND
Property prop·er·ty /ˈprɒpərti/
noun
1. Something owned; a possession.
2. A piece of real estate.
3. Something tangible or intangible to which its owner has legal title, such as copyrights and trademarks.
PROPERTY OF THE MIND [IN THE MIND] CANNOT BE OWNED IF EXPRESSED TO OTHER MINDS…OTHERWISE OTHER MINDS MUST BE REGULATED
With this singular concept, all human beings participating in consuming or engaging with any form of music, art, or entertainment are legally obligated to adhere to the laws governing copyright. This idea, by itself, necessitates an expanded government to monitor, track, administer, adjudicate, and punish any parties breaking those laws.
By definition, intellectual property and copyright law require a totalitarian state to enforce them. This necessarily means the state must intersect with media to propagate the necessity of the state-corporate existence, fulfilling its role in controlling the monetization of intellectual property consumption.
The Transformation of Art and Entertainment
Gone are the notions of the arts being ubiquitous expressions of culture, once shared by shamans and storytellers. These figures have been replaced by academics, pundits, and demagogues, whose positions are supported and defended by the full force of the law—specifically, coercive violence. The general population, once referred to as the “mass man,” [ORTEGA; The Revolt of the Masses] is now fully subjugated and imprisoned by linguistic narratives that color their perception of existence.
The Role of Disney / Marvel
Disney Marvel exemplifies this transformation. Originally a medium for creative storytelling and cultural reflection, it has become a vehicle for corporate interests and state propaganda. The narratives within Disney Marvel productions often align with prevailing political ideologies, subtly influencing the masses. The integration of corporate and state interests into popular culture through intellectual property laws has profound implications for the American political zeitgeist.
Disney / Marvel’s storytelling has evolved to include themes that resonate with contemporary political and social issues. While some argue this is a reflection of society, others see it as a strategic move to shape public opinion and maintain control over cultural narratives. By embedding political themes into widely consumed entertainment, Disney Marvel ensures that its messages reach a broad audience, subtly reinforcing the status quo and the necessity of the state-corporate existence.
The Legal and Cultural Implications
The enforcement of intellectual property laws has significant legal and cultural implications. It reinforces a system where creativity is commodified and controlled by a few powerful entities. This system not only stifles independent and alternative voices but also creates a dependency on corporate-produced content. The legal framework supporting intellectual property laws ensures that these corporations maintain their dominance, using the state’s coercive power to protect their interests.
Speculation on the Relationship Between Headland and Weinstein
The relationship between Disney Marvel and the broader entertainment industry can be further elucidated by examining the interactions and influences between key figures such as Harvey Weinstein and prominent media personalities. Weinstein, once a powerful figure in Hollywood, was known for his ability to shape narratives and control the careers of many within the industry. His downfall exposed a culture of moral apathy and systemic abuse, which was tolerated and, at times, facilitated by the industry’s power structures.
The case of Weinstein highlights the moral apathy that pervades the entertainment industry. Despite numerous allegations and clear evidence of his misconduct, Weinstein’s behavior was overlooked for decades due to his influence and the protection offered by those in power. This moral apathy is mirrored in the broader industry, where the pursuit of profit and control often overrides ethical considerations.
Speculating on how figures like Weinstein and potentially others in positions of power might have influenced Disney Marvel and similar entities, it’s plausible that their practices and attitudes toward intellectual property and creative control have contributed to a culture where exploitation and ethical compromises are normalized. The prioritization of intellectual property rights and the commodification of art may serve as mechanisms to maintain control and suppress dissent, perpetuating a cycle of abuse and moral disregard.
Moral Apathy in the Entertainment Industry
The moral apathy demonstrated by the industry’s tolerance of figures like Weinstein reflects a broader societal issue. When powerful individuals and corporations prioritize profit and control over ethical considerations, it creates an environment where abuse and exploitation can thrive. This apathy extends beyond individual cases and permeates the industry’s approach to intellectual property, where the focus is on maximizing revenue and maintaining control rather than fostering genuine creativity and cultural expression.
In the context of Disney Marvel and the American political zeitgeist, this moral apathy is particularly concerning. As these entities wield significant influence over public perception and cultural narratives, their ethical lapses and prioritization of control can have far-reaching implications. The intertwining of corporate interests with state power, facilitated by intellectual property laws, creates a system where moral considerations are secondary to the pursuit of power and profit.
Conclusion
Disney Marvel’s role in the American political zeitgeist is a testament to the power of intellectual property laws in shaping culture and controlling narratives. The shift from art as a ubiquitous cultural expression to a controlled and commodified industry highlights the interplay between corporate interests and state power. The speculation on the relationship between figures like Headland and Weinstein underscores the moral apathy that pervades the industry, with significant implications for society at large. As the general population consumes these narratives, their perceptions and understandings of the world are subtly influenced, reinforcing the necessity of the state-corporate existence and its control over intellectual property.
In conclusion, the current state of cinema, music, art, and entertainment is a reflection of the broader socio-political dynamics at play. The intersection of intellectual property laws, corporate interests, and moral apathy has transformed these mediums into tools for shaping public opinion and maintaining control over cultural narratives. Disney Marvel’s influence on the American political zeitgeist is a powerful example of how these forces operate, highlighting the opportunity for independent critical thinkers to enervate the arts with new visions.